Jeff Lehman

Repelling a switch

How can declarer increase his chances that the opponents do not find the winning switch?

That was the issue I had to face on Board 20 of the Saturday evening, July 23 session of a two-session regional pairs at the Toronto NABCs.

West

♠ 985

♥ AK3

♦ KQ

♣ JT876

East

♠ Q2

♥ JT9

♦ A653

♣ KQ42

As West, I opened 1♣ and rebid 1NT over partner’s 1♦ response.  Partner raised to 3NT and North led the ♥5.

Clearly, I need to knock out the ♣A.  I was fortunate to have escaped a spade opening lead.  How can I best continue that good fortune when I must let the opponents in once again?

I played a heart from dummy and South followed with the ♥6 (presumptively right side up count).  I won the first trick with the ♥K, trying to look like a man with AK tight.  I led a club from hand and North hopped with the ♣A, his partner playing the ♣3.

At the table, not only did I escape a spade switch, but when North returned a second heart (the two), I was back to owning three heart tricks, recovering the trick I intentionally gave away at Trick 1!  Three hearts, three diamonds, and four clubs for +630 was worth 31.5 mps (on a top of 33, I think).

The whole hand:

Dealer:

Vul:

North

♠ A764

♥ Q8752

♦ J92

♣ A

West

♠ 985

♥ AK3

♦ KQ

♣ JT876

East

♠ Q2

♥ JT9

♦ A653

♣ KQ42

South

♠ KJT3

♥ 64

♦ T874

♣ 953


1 Comment

Daniel SkipperAugust 20th, 2011 at 4:44 am

Nice play.

It was an enlightening day when I first really understood that the problem I can see is not the same as the problem the defense can see.

Leave a comment

Your comment