Wernher Open Pairs, second final: what was up must …
Having blogged about the 63% first final session of Barry Purrington and me, fairness requires a blog about the 37% second session, from the Wernher Open Pairs, rated a national event, in Toronto.
Agreeing on opening bid style is an important element for a successful partnership. Playing with a good partner, but in a nonregular partnership, we came a cropper on two hands from the second final.
Dealer: 1-N
Vul: None |
North
♠ KJ97 ♥ QJ2 ♦ 4 ♣ T9754 |
|
West
♠ 53 ♥ AT ♦ QJ9532 ♣ QJ3 |
East
♠ AT42 ♥ K9753 ♦ A876 ♣ — |
|
South
♠ Q86 ♥ 864 ♦ KT ♣ AK862 |
West | North | East | South |
— | P | P | 1♣ |
1♦ | 3♣ | 4♦ | All pass |
Partner passed the East hand, a hand I would have opened. I passed the 4♦ response and we had not only missed game, we had also missed slam. I also slopped a trick in declarer play and +150 was worth only 7 mps on a top of, I think, 64.
Dealer: 20-W
Vul: Both |
North
♠ Q43 ♥ JT874 ♦ QJ4 ♣ 84 |
|
West
♠ T985 ♥ AK952 ♦ 6 ♣ KT3 |
East
♠ K2 ♥ Q6 ♦ AK98 ♣ AQJ76 |
|
South
♠ AJ76 ♥ 3 ♦ T7532 ♣ 952 |
West | North | East | South |
1♥ | P | 2♣ | P |
2♥ | P | 4NT | P |
5♥ | P | 6NT | All pass |
My 2♥ rebid was forced by system agreements (3♣ and 2♠ would show extras and 2NT was verboten with a stiff). Not allowing for such a weak opening bid, partner advanced the auction quickly to 6NT before I could show my club support. 6♣ seems like a fair contract (but would not make on this lie of cards) and 6NT had no chance. Down 2 for 5.5 mps.
Dealer: 7-S
Vul: Both |
North
♠ 2 ♥ Q652 ♦ AKJ7 ♣ Q854 |
|
West
♠ AQ875 ♥ A ♦ 4 ♣ KJT963 |
East
♠ 643 ♥ JT43 ♦ QT963 ♣ 2 |
|
South
♠ KJT9 ♥ K987 ♦ 852 ♣ A7 |
Many poorly declared or poorly defended hands followed, and, while the severity of our bad score was a surprise to me, we clearly knew that we had fallen far, far from contention.
Dealer: 4-W
Vul: Both |
North
♠ J6 ♥ AT632 ♦ K3 ♣ AT76 |
|
West
♠ AKQT72 ♥ 984 ♦ J74 ♣ 3 |
East
♠ 43 ♥ KQJ7 ♦ T98 ♣ KQ94 |
|
South
♠ 985 ♥ 5 ♦ AQ652 ♣ J852 |
When I played golf regularly, a bad round seemed always to be capped by a good last hole, thus producing encouragement that the next round would be much better. So, too, it was with this session of bridge. On the last board we were playing a pair whose skills I respect but, well, I really do not like much. Given the results on earlier boards, where I had learned of differences in opening bid standards between partner and me, I would have been well-advised not to have opened the West hand with 1♠. But that is the opening I chose. When North decided to overcall 2♥, and that call was passed back to me, I chose also to pass, rather than compete when I held a heart fragment and such a weak hand. I am sure that partner, who was awaiting a conversion of a balancing double, thought that we had suffered yet another bad board. However, 2♥ was not a happy contract for the opponents. I was doubly pleased when North, who discovered early in the hand how good were my spades, gave me a look that said “you really do not know what you are doing” and then we earned 58 mps for +300 defending 2♥ undoubled. (On the previous board, these opponents missed a cold notrump game, when I opened a balanced, but poor, 13 count and they held 25 of the missing 27 HCP. Yay!)
We’ll get the rest of the field next time.
Doncha love people who make comments like this, Jeff? “You really do not know what you are doing”!!!
Many years ago, in a KO match, partner and I were explaining methods prior to play. One of my opponents responded to one treatment with this line: “That is a stupid way to play.” Gee; thanks! I told him, “Then – don’t choose to play it.”
A great deal of satisfaction, I must say, after beating this idiot with our “stupid methods.”
Well, Peg, it was only a look, not verbally articulated …. but even the look is not exactly the most appropriate of table behaviors.
FWIW, I would never have dreamed of making a 2H overcall on his hand … but I would never consider so telling him (a Grand LM, btw).
Good to hear from you.
Jeff – I’m with you (the 2H overcall.) Perhaps you should have given him a “you don’t know what you are doing” kinda look. Of course, I’d always prefer to skip “the look” and simply reap the rewards of the opponent’s action!