Jeff Lehman

Cool defense; cool comment

Defending in a club Swiss this morning, against a declarer with over 13,000 mps, you encounter an uncommon agreement in the auction of the opponents:

North
South
2
2
31
42
All Pass
 
(1) Strong 2 in diamonds with four hearts
(2) after long hesitation

Partner leads the 2, playing 3rd/low.

N
South
KJ62
J93
J109865
 
2
E
West
10843
AK2
942
A73

 

Do you like the lead?  What is your defensive plan?

… 

 

… 

 

… 

I won the A, felling declarer’s K.  I liked partner’s lead; what I did not like is knowing that trumps are 3-3.  Otherwise, a club continuation would shorten declarer to a length less than one of the defenders.  However, there surely were no side suit winners, and so continuing clubs might have some merit.  I noticed that declarer’s transportation was messy: he has no cards remaining in dummy’s best suit and dummy was dealt no cards in declarer’s best suit.  Maybe, especially if the K were not an entry to dummy, we could develop an extra trump trick via a force anyway?  

I continued a small club and declarer ruffed and then advanced a trump to dummy’s 9.  I won the K and played a third round of clubs, declarer ruffing again.  The rounded suit volley continued when declarer led the Q, which I won with my other heart top for our third trick.  I continued the attack on declarer’s entries by playing a spade back.  Declarer won the A (that’s good news, because winning the spade in dummy would allow declarer to draw trumps with the J and then get to his hand with the A and claim with good diamonds.)  Declarer next played three rounds of high diamonds, both partner and I following all three rounds.  When declarer played a fourth good diamond, partner ruffed with the T and declarer overruffed with the J in dummy.

Now declarer conceded down one by saying “giving up a trick to your ace”.  He knew we held the thirteener trump and he held all the tops in the other suits.  But winning a trick with my 2 having been favored by being denominated an ace was pretty cool.

The whole hand:

 
5
None
North
N
North
A
Q864
AKQJ763
K
 
W
West
10843
AK2
942
A73
2
E
East
Q975
1075
1085
Q42
 
S
South
KJ62
J93
J109865
 

FWIW, I am not a fan of their auction choices.  I prefer opening 1, and I prefer a 3NT second round bid by responder.

But then there would be no story.


1 Comment

Dave Memphis MOJOOctober 5th, 2014 at 5:25 pm

I like the 3H bid showing the hand they described, but this particular hand is not nearly strong enough. 3H should show a rock-crusher.

Leave a comment

Your comment