Jeff Lehman

Crocodile Hunger

Here was Board 14 of Tuesday’s club game.

 

 
14
None
East
N
North
KJ9
Q732
J1074
Q9
 
W
West
AQ42
A86
9
A10742
4
E
East
76
KJ9
KQ52
K653
 
S
South
10853
1054
A863
J8
 

East was declarer in 3NT after an auction of 1-1; 1NT-3NT.  South led a small heart, small from dummy, queen from North, king from declarer.

Declarer ran five clubs.  North pitched his three remaining hearts, East pitched a small diamond and South pitched his two remaining hearts and a diamond.

 

 
14
None
East
N
North
KJ9
 
J1074
 
 
W
West
AQ42
A6
9
 
4
E
East
76
J9
KQ5
 
 
S
South
10853
 
A83
 
 

At this point declarer could settle for ten tricks by establishing a diamond trick (with a heart entry to such trick should a high diamond honor lose to the A) and refusing the spade finesse (1+3+1+5).  However, at matchpoints it is difficult to avoid the temptation for an extra trick by taking the spade finesse.  Alas, there is a potential danger in the parlay of establishing a diamond trick AND taking the spade finesse.  What if the A is held by South, South chooses to withhold the ace, the spade finesse loses to North, and North then returns a diamond through the remaining high diamond honor of East?  In that case, the defense might win THREE diamond tricks and a spade trick, holding declarer to only nine tricks.

At the table, declarer chose to lead not a diamond at the shown position, but rather to lead a heart to his jack and take the spade finesse, losing to North’s king.

North might possess enough clues to choose to now return the J.  East opened 1 and yet has four clubs, leaving East with no more than five major suit cards.  South’s failure to have discarded a spade suggests that South holds exactly four spades and is maintaining parity with dummy’s spade length.  If South were dealt four spades, then a return of the J both unblocks the spade suit and could possibly pin a doubleton T in declarer’s hand.

At the table, however, North chose to return a diamond to declarer’s high honor and South’s ace.  South returned his smallest remaining spade to dummy’s A, giving North a second opportunity to jettison the J.  North instead played the 9.  Declarer now cashed the A, and, being locked in dummy, presenting North with a third opportunity to discard the J.  That opportunity was declined, and a third spade from dummy placed North on lead with the J.  With only diamonds left in North’s hand, the forced diamond return provided declarer a steppingstone to the stranded diamond winner.  Ten tricks.

Had North jettisoned the J on the second round of spades, a third spade from dummy would have allowed South to execute a Crocodile Coup by opening the jaws of his T to swallow his partner’s 9 and then closing the jaws to cash the 8, winning three spades as well as the A.  Sadly, however, the crocodile remained unfed.


1 Comment

PhasmidAugust 6th, 2015 at 4:00 am

I can see no reason not to play the HA before tackling the pointy suits. That will force but North and South to discard something–it seems odd that they would pitch all their hearts thus helping declarer count out the hand. Let’s guess that North pitches a diamond, South a spade.

So, HA (trick 7), diamond to K, allowed to win presumably (8). At this point, the HJ is no longer needed for reentry so might as well be cashed (9). Let’s say they discard as before. Now it’s simply a question of taking the (losing) spade hook (10), giving up two diamonds and (11, 12) and winning the spade ace (13) for 10 tricks.

The result would be the same as at the table, but your declarer gave the defenders a chance for four tricks. Did they shed crocodile tears when they realized what had happened?

Leave a comment

Your comment