Jeff Lehman

Popping or Dropping

Len Aberbach played a grand slam contract on Friday morning in a way that he could take full advantage of some non-optimal discarding by the opponents.

 

North
   AKJ64
   J742
   72
   82
South
   5
   A6
   AT
   AKT97654

 

West North East South
P P 2
2 (controls: one ace and one king)  3 
P 3  4 
P 6 P 7
All pass      

The 7 call strikes me as an overbid, particularly in a club game where even reaching a possibly low-range high card small slam is quite likely to score well.

West opened the K and Len won the ace in hand.  He then proceeded to play all eight rounds of clubs.  West followed suit twice and discarded two hearts (the 8 and 3), two diamonds (the J and 4) and two small spades.  East followed suit once.  East’s first discard was the K, and his remaining six discards were two more hearts (5 and 9) and four small diamonds.

Len reached this four card end position:

 

North
   AKJ
   J
 
 
South
   5
   A6
   T
 

When Len played the A, West discarded a small spade, dummy followed suit with the J, and East discarded T.

“Known” from the discards was that West retained the Q (to which Len’s T was a threat card) and East retained the Q (the only remaining heart of the opponents that can top Len’s 6).  Accordingly, each defender had retained two spades.  Len played spades from the top and found that East had been dealt the QT doubleton.  Making seven for a top board.

The opponents had discarded less than optimally.  East should retain a heart that could be played on the Trick A, so that the distribution of hearts is not fully disclosed.  East might also consider earlier discarding the Q, a “known” card, rather than the J, a “not quite known” card.  And on the A West should play the “known” Q rather than the not known T. 

Let’s say that the opponents had discarded as I suggest.

At the four card end position shown above, West would follow suit on the lead of the A, dummy would follow suit with the J and East, who at this stage would hold QT, should play the Q, the card he is known to hold.

At this point, Len would realize that the six cards retained by the opponents were the Q (or J), T, and four spades to the queen.  Of these six cards, only West’s ownership of the  honor can be inferred.  West’s other two cards might be two spades or could be the T and only one spade.  And East’s remaining three cards might be three spades or could be two spades and the T.  Since only the latter of each of those two possibilities would land the slam (assuming any singleton spade held by West was not the singleton Q), Len would have played for spades to drop and landed the slam.

Essentially, once declarer infers that West has retained a diamond honor (necessary because Len’s T is a threat card), the hand can play as a pop-up squeeze.  If West were dealt the Q, no finesse is necessary because the Q must fall (“pop”) from West on the two top spades in dummy.  Meanwhile, the vigorish in playing for the pop-up squeeze is that the slam is also landed in the event that East were dealt Q or Qx, in which case the Q would “drop” from East.

 

Dealer: N, #13
Vul: Both
North
   AKJ64
   J742
   72
   82
 
West
   98732
   83
   KQJ4
   Q3
East
   QT
   KQT95
   98653
   J
  South
   5
   A6
   AT
   AKT97654
 

 


3 Comments

David GoldfarbFebruary 12th, 2012 at 7:31 pm

I’ve usually heard that called a “show-up squeeze”.

David Memphis MOJO SmithFebruary 14th, 2012 at 3:46 pm

1. Do you know what bidding 6 clubs and making seven would have scored? Probably the same top they received for bidding the risky grand.

2. Do you agree with the 2 club opening bid? (I don’t, by the way.)

Jeff LehmanFebruary 14th, 2012 at 4:08 pm

Mojo,

On a 13 top, +2140 was 12.96 (factored 13), 1470 11.88, 1390 10.27. Seven pairs scored 640. I agree with your suggestion to pass 6C; there’s one loser that my bidding did not allow partner to count on being covered.

I am fine with partner’s choice to open 2C. As a general rule, I try to compare quick tricks to losers, and his hand has four of each and, importantly, no expected rebid problems. I wouldn’t criticize a 1C opener to be followed by some sort of jump shift (which may well be fake, a strike against that alternative), but if I held his hand I would have opened 2C also. After all, two small clubs and a red king make game a favorite … even though partner might pass a 1C opening. (But rightly or wrongly, I would probably have interfered with the artificial auction had I been sitting East or West.)

David,

I have heard both terms (pop-up and show-up squeeze). But “popping” rhymes with “dropping”, and so the topic title and term use were sort of literary-restricted!

— Jeff

Leave a comment

Your comment