Jeff Lehman

Popping or Dropping

Len Aberbach played a grand slam contract on Friday morning in a way that he could take full advantage of some non-optimal discarding by the opponents.

 

North
♠   AKJ64
♥   J742
♦   72
♣   82
South
♠   5
♥   A6
♦   AT
♣   AKT97654

 

West North East South
— P P 2♣
P  2♠ (controls: one ace and one king)  P  3♣ 
P 3♠  P  4♣ 
P 6♣ P 7♣
All pass      

The 7♣ call strikes me as an overbid, particularly in a club game where even reaching a possibly low-range high card small slam is quite likely to score well.

West opened the ♦K and Len won the ace in hand.  He then proceeded to play all eight rounds of clubs.  West followed suit twice and discarded two hearts (the 8 and 3), two diamonds (the J and 4) and two small spades.  East followed suit once.  East’s first discard was the ♥K, and his remaining six discards were two more hearts (5 and 9) and four small diamonds.

Len reached this four card end position:

 

North
♠   AKJ
♥   J
♦  
♣  
South
♠   5
♥   A6
♦   T
♣  

When Len played the ♥A, West discarded a small spade, dummy followed suit with the ♥J, and East discarded ♥T.

“Known” from the discards was that West retained the ♦Q (to which Len’s ♦T was a threat card) and East retained the ♥Q (the only remaining heart of the opponents that can top Len’s ♥6).  Accordingly, each defender had retained two spades.  Len played spades from the top and found that East had been dealt the ♠QT doubleton.  Making seven for a top board.

The opponents had discarded less than optimally.  East should retain a heart that could be played on the Trick ♥A, so that the distribution of hearts is not fully disclosed.  East might also consider earlier discarding the ♦Q, a “known” card, rather than the ♦J, a “not quite known” card.  And on the ♥A West should play the “known” ♥Q rather than the not known ♥T. 

Let’s say that the opponents had discarded as I suggest.

At the four card end position shown above, West would follow suit on the lead of the ♥A, dummy would follow suit with the ♥J and East, who at this stage would hold ♥QT, should play the ♥Q, the card he is known to hold.

At this point, Len would realize that the six cards retained by the opponents were the ♦Q (or ♦J), ♥T, and four spades to the queen.  Of these six cards, only West’s ownership of the ♦ honor can be inferred.  West’s other two cards might be two spades or could be the ♥T and only one spade.  And East’s remaining three cards might be three spades or could be two spades and the ♥T.  Since only the latter of each of those two possibilities would land the slam (assuming any singleton spade held by West was not the singleton ♠Q), Len would have played for spades to drop and landed the slam.

Essentially, once declarer infers that West has retained a diamond honor (necessary because Len’s ♦T is a threat card), the hand can play as a pop-up squeeze.  If West were dealt the ♠Q, no finesse is necessary because the ♠Q must fall (“pop”) from West on the two top spades in dummy.  Meanwhile, the vigorish in playing for the pop-up squeeze is that the slam is also landed in the event that East were dealt ♠Q or ♠Qx, in which case the ♠Q would “drop” from East.

 

Dealer: N, #13
Vul: Both
North
♠   AKJ64
♥   J742
♦   72
♣   82
 
West
♠   98732
♥   83
♦   KQJ4
♣   Q3
East
♠   QT
♥   KQT95
♦   98653
♣   J
  South
♠   5
♥   A6
♦   AT
♣   AKT97654
 

 


3 Comments

David GoldfarbFebruary 12th, 2012 at 7:31 pm

I’ve usually heard that called a “show-up squeeze”.

David Memphis MOJO SmithFebruary 14th, 2012 at 3:46 pm

1. Do you know what bidding 6 clubs and making seven would have scored? Probably the same top they received for bidding the risky grand.

2. Do you agree with the 2 club opening bid? (I don’t, by the way.)

Jeff LehmanFebruary 14th, 2012 at 4:08 pm

Mojo,

On a 13 top, +2140 was 12.96 (factored 13), 1470 11.88, 1390 10.27. Seven pairs scored 640. I agree with your suggestion to pass 6C; there’s one loser that my bidding did not allow partner to count on being covered.

I am fine with partner’s choice to open 2C. As a general rule, I try to compare quick tricks to losers, and his hand has four of each and, importantly, no expected rebid problems. I wouldn’t criticize a 1C opener to be followed by some sort of jump shift (which may well be fake, a strike against that alternative), but if I held his hand I would have opened 2C also. After all, two small clubs and a red king make game a favorite … even though partner might pass a 1C opening. (But rightly or wrongly, I would probably have interfered with the artificial auction had I been sitting East or West.)

David,

I have heard both terms (pop-up and show-up squeeze). But “popping” rhymes with “dropping”, and so the topic title and term use were sort of literary-restricted!

— Jeff

Leave a comment

Your comment